I recently stumbled across a periodical titled The Architecture Journal. The title, though, could be construed as misleading. Instead of content about buildings, materials, and cities, it spoke of software, business, and information. The Architecture Journal is, indeed, a publication about “information architecture” sponsored by none other than that great behemoth of the digital world, Microsoft. Information architecture is a term coined by former (I am tempted to insert the adjective “real” here) architect Richard Saul Wurman, who is also noted for creating the TED Conferences and has is involved with the Design Futures Council.

Mr. Wurman re-living his first TED talk, on an alternative way to peel a banana. Photo by Jeremy Edmunds.
Mr. Wurman coined the term information architecture in 1976 as a response to the explosion of ill-organized information in that era. Proclaiming the need for a systemic design in the organization and presentation of data, he developed the Access Travel Guides as a manifestation of what defined information architecture. The Access Travel Guides were something of the ancestors to the contemporary “infographic.” The Architecture Journal, on the other hand, moves even further into contemporary technology, aligning itself with the information architecture definition prevalent within information technology circles — that of the system design of networked computers.

Cover of The Architecture Journal Issue 15: “The Role of an Architect.”
It is interesting how close the metaphor of architecture defines the work that an information architect does and the processes by which he or she operates. There is even an issue of The Architecture Journal that is titled “The Role of an Architect,” a title that is eerily apt for the debates that are raging within the discipline of architecture. One begins to wonder what the definition of architecture is — can it be extended and simplified to the extent of vague “systems design”? Is there anything innate about buildings to architecture? Or, in other words, perhaps not all architecture is architecture, though all of architecture is architecture.
Once again, in the end, all we are left with is metaphor.











